permanent pre-moderation means also...

Good one, Tonnie!!!

WOOHOO Tonnie, Freethinkers Anonymous. I'm Bernice and I'm a freethinker.
Thanks DJG!!

bernicer wrote:

WOOHOO Tonnie, Freethinkers Anonymous. I'm Bernice and I'm a freethinker.
Thanks DJG!!

Ooooh shoot, B, you just let the cat out of the bag!!! Dang...

I dream a dream that Susan reaches a point, say yesterday, where she retains a public relations outfit that actually understands that her appeal is worldwide and crosses generations. The possibilities would be boundless...

pipechanter wrote:

I dream a dream that Susan reaches a point, say yesterday, where she retains a public relations outfit that actually understands that her appeal is worldwide and crosses generations. The possibilities would be boundless...

Dreams do come true and here's hoping this one does.

bernicer wrote:

WOOHOO Tonnie, Freethinkers Anonymous. I'm Bernice and I'm a freethinker.
Thanks DJG!!

Yes you are Bernice, and I admire you for that

nevermore wrote:

bernicer wrote:

WOOHOO Tonnie, Freethinkers Anonymous. I'm Bernice and I'm a freethinker.
Thanks DJG!!

Yes you are Bernice, and I admire you for that

Thank you Nevermore, the admiration is mutual.

Board requirement: INTEGRITY!!!!!

---

it's good that you post this, boss, just a year after the mass-premoderation, and what else...

tonnie_rocca wrote:

---

Next week the ew group-pre-mod-throw-out has been a year ago... that's definitely not the way to manage a forum, unless - for some reason - you prefer to stimulate group-thinking and behaviour...


Thanks to DJG who created on time this funny - and at the same time d*mned serious - place for freethinkers...

I wonder why they are so scared of us that they have to put us on permanent premoderation! We are quite harmless!

TxTammy wrote:

I wonder why they are so scared of us that they have to put us on permanent premoderation! We are quite harmless!

The point is: harmless, but not brainless, that's what scares them...

tonnie_rocca wrote:

TxTammy wrote:

I wonder why they are so scared of us that they have to put us on permanent premoderation! We are quite harmless!

The point is: harmless, but not brainless, that's what scares them...

That's a fact. They don't want anyone there who can question them at all. I get warned for telling the truth. Others are held in high regard for lying.

nevermore wrote:

tonnie_rocca wrote:

TxTammy wrote:

I wonder why they are so scared of us that they have to put us on permanent premoderation! We are quite harmless!

The point is: harmless, but not brainless, that's what scares them...

That's a fact. They don't want anyone there who can question them at all. I get warned for telling the truth. Others are held in high regard for lying.

Also, some CAN break the rules, while others CANNOT!

---

"Length of time unknown", I heard that before from the same authorities...

---

For people who want to know the truth (candidate board members and so...)

When the indefinite premod wave happened on the 17th of Febrary 2011, such a sanction was not in the rules, by then the maximum premod time was 7 days.
The following extra rule was added afterwards by ew admin K. on the 28th of April 2011:

6. At the discretion of the Administrators, those who continuously disrupt the forum or violate Rule #3 persistenly may be put on indefinite pre-mod

So be aware that in the past the rules have been adapted to the measures already executed.
It's all a big farce...


And let us never forget how they refused to let WAM appeal for her banning. This was and is the rule:

Note: You can appeal the decision to the Appeal Panel as of the 4th warning.