| Ponylady Will Never Work! | |
|
+9WAMcKinley LMiller4Susan Lovin' Every Minute bajaraquel Wabbit TxTammy Admin janakimack fudgemeister 13 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
fudgemeister
Posts : 83742 Points : 89806 Join date : 2010-10-25 Age : 74 Location : NYS
| Subject: Ponylady Will Never Work! Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:42 am | |
| Now that SBFII has made a joke out of their appeals process, Ponylady will probably NEVER chair an appeal by a member. In case you have not heard by now, long time SBFII member, WAMcKinley, was denied her right to appeal. The administration found a convenient loophole as to why she had no right to appeal her banning. You see, the rule states that a member can only appeal a banning after 4 warnings. WAM NEVER received 4 warnings! Now think about it, anytime the administration wants to get rid of a member, they just have to ban that person before giving him/her a 4th warning! As Dana Carvey's Church Lady might say, "How conveeeeenient!" This is reaching a new all-time low! Doing this, when the cards are stacked against any member going into the appeal process ANY WAY! What is the matter Tink and Kalua, did you think WAM was going to win her appeal??!! After all, one of you plus a staff member would be on the jury, with 2 picked by WAM. The deciding vote would be Ponylady. So, in one fell swoop, the administration has made a sham of the appeals process. This done to WAM. You all KNOW WAM! WAM is a kind, wonderful person with a strong moral character. Her ethics are stellar. When she was a moderator at SBFII, you all KNOW that she was the best and fairest one they had. WAM did not deserve to be treated this shabbily! You, the members there who know in your gut that there has been unfairness and injustice there, it is time to find your moral compass and say, as your administrator is so fond of saying, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! [/quote]
Last edited by fudgemeister on Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:21 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| |
janakimack
Posts : 10861 Points : 11460 Join date : 2009-10-09
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:31 am | |
| |
|
| |
Admin Admin
Posts : 16272 Points : 19536 Join date : 2009-09-19
| |
| |
TxTammy
Posts : 9788 Points : 10523 Join date : 2009-10-27
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:15 pm | |
| Reality Check....WAM must have committed the most horrendous crime! Shame on you WAM! You should hire LEM to appeal the appeal.
Earth to SBFII! You should be ashamed of getting rid of members that way! |
|
| |
Wabbit
Posts : 80023 Points : 81619 Join date : 2009-10-11 Location : Illinois, USA
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Fri Sep 23, 2011 5:38 pm | |
| A Donkey on the court..... Donkey's never play fair. They always kick people around. Looks like it rubbed off on others on the court too but maybe it was the other way round. |
|
| |
fudgemeister
Posts : 83742 Points : 89806 Join date : 2010-10-25 Age : 74 Location : NYS
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Fri Sep 23, 2011 5:52 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Wabbit
Posts : 80023 Points : 81619 Join date : 2009-10-11 Location : Illinois, USA
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Fri Sep 23, 2011 5:56 pm | |
| |
|
| |
bajaraquel
Posts : 2225 Points : 2330 Join date : 2009-11-16 Location : Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Sat Sep 24, 2011 1:19 am | |
| Donkey? Who took my Donkey?
The treatment of WAM is only a reflection of everything wrong with that cult. |
|
| |
Lovin' Every Minute
Posts : 5255 Points : 5473 Join date : 2009-09-22 Location : Connecticut, USA
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Sat Sep 24, 2011 1:26 am | |
| - fudgemeister wrote:
- Now that SBFII has made a joke out of their appeals process, Ponylady will probably NEVER chair an appeal by a member. In case you have not heard by now, long time SBFII member, WAMcKinley, was denied her right to appeal. The administration found a convenient loophole as to why she had no right to appeal her banning. You see, the rule states that a member can only appeal a banning after 4 warnings. WAM NEVER received 4 warnings!
Now think about it, anytime the administration wants to get rid of a member, they just have to ban that person before giving him/her a 4th warning! As Dana Carvey's Church Lady might say, "How conveeeeenient!" This is reaching a new all-time low! Doing this, when the cards are stacked against any member going into the appeal process ANY WAY! What is the matter Tink and Kalua, did you think WAM was going to win her appeal??!! After all, one of you plus a staff member would be on the jury, with 2 picked by WAM. The deciding vote would be Ponylady.
So, in one fell swoop, the administration has made a sham of the appeals process. This done to WAM. You all KNOW WAM! WAM is a kind, wonderful person with a strong moral character. Her ethics are stellar. When she was a moderator at SBFII, you all KNOW that she was the best and fairest one they had. WAM did not deserve to be treated this shabbily! You, the members there who know in your gut that there has been unfairness and injustice there, it is time to find your moral compass and say, as your administrator is so fond of saying, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! Truly ingenious loopholes are never really found . . . they're created. Which is what happened here. |
|
| |
LMiller4Susan
Posts : 891 Points : 908 Join date : 2011-06-15 Location : NY
| |
| |
LMiller4Susan
Posts : 891 Points : 908 Join date : 2011-06-15 Location : NY
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Sat Sep 24, 2011 2:21 am | |
| Wait a minute. Are you guys talking about EW or the US Supreme court? |
|
| |
WAMcKinley
Posts : 21314 Points : 21562 Join date : 2009-10-09 Age : 79 Location : Concord, New Hampshire
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Sat Sep 24, 2011 4:15 am | |
| [quote="TxTammy"]Reality Check....WAM must have committed the most horrendous crime! __________________________________________________
Yes, certainly I must have. I wonder what it could have been. No one seems to want to talk with me about it. Kalua informed me at one point that when Paul Wood, the original owner of the forum, found out I had become a member at DJG's, he wanted me banned, then and there. I found that interesting as I had declared my intent in the staff room originally before I visited the first time-----and no one told me not to go. Equally mysterious is that Kalua was a member at DJG's for a while------and no one at the OF threatened HIM with a punishment. That no doubt had to do with a service he was providing there for the forum,---spying and reporting back. It all depends on who you are when it comes to what you can get away with---and if you're willing to engage in nefarious activities for "the cause." Maybe I wasn't ENOUGH of a criminal! Could that be it?? |
|
| |
andyp
Posts : 19951 Points : 19963 Join date : 2011-03-08 Location : Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Sat Sep 24, 2011 5:19 am | |
| - fudgemeister wrote:
- Now that SBFII has made a joke out of their appeals process, Ponylady will probably NEVER chair an appeal by a member. In case you have not heard by now, long time SBFII member, WAMcKinley, was denied her right to appeal. The administration found a convenient loophole as to why she had no right to appeal her banning. You see, the rule states that a member can only appeal a banning after 4 warnings. WAM NEVER received 4 warnings!
Now think about it, anytime the administration wants to get rid of a member, they just have to ban that person before giving him/her a 4th warning! As Dana Carvey's Church Lady might say, "How conveeeeenient!" This is reaching a new all-time low! Doing this, when the cards are stacked against any member going into the appeal process ANY WAY! What is the matter Tink and Kalua, did you think WAM was going to win her appeal??!! After all, one of you plus a staff member would be on the jury, with 2 picked by WAM. The deciding vote would be Ponylady.
So, in one fell swoop, the administration has made a sham of the appeals process. This done to WAM. You all KNOW WAM! WAM is a kind, wonderful person with a strong moral character. Her ethics are stellar. When she was a moderator at SBFII, you all KNOW that she was the best and fairest one they had. WAM did not deserve to be treated this shabbily! You, the members there who know in your gut that there has been unfairness and injustice there, it is time to find your moral compass and say, as your administrator is so fond of saying, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! Good for you, Fudge, for stating it so clearly. |
|
| |
fudgemeister
Posts : 83742 Points : 89806 Join date : 2010-10-25 Age : 74 Location : NYS
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Sat Sep 24, 2011 5:49 am | |
| Isn't it just too bad. I know a lot of us were looking forward to the actual hearing just to see what a sham it was going to be. As it turns out, this is the sham. I have a suggestion, since it does not appear that there will EVER be an appeal, I believe that Ponylady should be replaced by her pony on the appellate board. |
|
| |
Lovin' Every Minute
Posts : 5255 Points : 5473 Join date : 2009-09-22 Location : Connecticut, USA
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Sat Sep 24, 2011 1:07 pm | |
| [quote="WAMcKinley"] - TxTammy wrote:
- Reality Check....WAM must have committed the most horrendous crime!
__________________________________________________
Yes, certainly I must have. I wonder what it could have been. No one seems to want to talk with me about it. Kalua informed me at one point that when Paul Wood, the original owner of the forum, found out I had become a member at DJG's, he wanted me banned, then and there. I found that interesting as I had declared my intent in the staff room originally before I visited the first time-----and no one told me not to go. Equally mysterious is that Kalua was a member at DJG's for a while------and no one at the OF threatened HIM with a punishment. That no doubt had to do with a service he was providing there for the forum,---spying and reporting back. It all depends on who you are when it comes to what you can get away with---and if you're willing to engage in nefarious activities for "the cause." Maybe I wasn't ENOUGH of a criminal! Could that be it?? I highly doubt that Paul Wood gave a steaming lump of fecal matter over who the mods of the site were. He was too busy looking for the highest bidder to get the whole mess off of his hands! |
|
| |
fudgemeister
Posts : 83742 Points : 89806 Join date : 2010-10-25 Age : 74 Location : NYS
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:10 pm | |
| |
|
| |
fudgemeister
Posts : 83742 Points : 89806 Join date : 2010-10-25 Age : 74 Location : NYS
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:25 pm | |
| |
|
| |
LMiller4Susan
Posts : 891 Points : 908 Join date : 2011-06-15 Location : NY
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:35 pm | |
| Anyone who says Susan Boyle has to be married before she can sing romantic songs is a moron right there. |
|
| |
WAMcKinley
Posts : 21314 Points : 21562 Join date : 2009-10-09 Age : 79 Location : Concord, New Hampshire
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:00 pm | |
| - LMiller4Susan wrote:
- Anyone who says Susan Boyle has to be married before she can sing romantic songs is a moron right there.
______________________________________________________ Who said that?? |
|
| |
fudgemeister
Posts : 83742 Points : 89806 Join date : 2010-10-25 Age : 74 Location : NYS
| |
| |
LMiller4Susan
Posts : 891 Points : 908 Join date : 2011-06-15 Location : NY
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Sun Sep 25, 2011 4:58 am | |
| - fudgemeister wrote:
- WAMcKinley wrote:
- LMiller4Susan wrote:
- Anyone who says Susan Boyle has to be married before she can sing romantic songs is a moron right there.
______________________________________________________
Who said that?? It has been reported that Ponylady posted that. Right out of the horses a@@ mouth she needs a and then maybe she'll grow up |
|
| |
skywriter
Posts : 4066 Points : 4183 Join date : 2010-05-09 Age : 77 Location : Kentucky
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:15 am | |
| [quote="WAMcKinley"] - TxTammy wrote:
- Reality Check....WAM must have committed the most horrendous crime!
__________________________________________________
Yes, certainly I must have. I wonder what it could have been. No one seems to want to talk with me about it. Kalua informed me at one point that when Paul Wood, the original owner of the forum, found out I had become a member at DJG's, he wanted me banned, then and there. I found that interesting as I had declared my intent in the staff room originally before I visited the first time-----and no one told me not to go. Equally mysterious is that Kalua was a member at DJG's for a while------and no one at the OF threatened HIM with a punishment. That no doubt had to do with a service he was providing there for the forum,---spying and reporting back. It all depends on who you are when it comes to what you can get away with---and if you're willing to engage in nefarious activities for "the cause." Maybe I wasn't ENOUGH of a criminal! Could that be it?? The more I learn about Kalua, the more I dislike him. WAM, I think Kalua was threatened by you. You're a strong woman, and you speak your mind. You didn't defer to him or cajole him or flirt with him. Some men can't relate to women who don't fit into some sort of gender based relationship--mommy, confidant, flirt, whatever--and each provides some form of flattery and ego stroking. I think Kalua requires a lot of both from women. I'm guessing you just weren't deferential enough for him, which meant you were a threat to his authority, and feeling threatened probably offended his manhood. And then you took up with DJG's. Yes, well, he did too, but he's quite sure he didn't like it. But you liked it, and stayed, and they liked you. And his suck-up little moles (all women, betcha!) came back with stories about how we made fun of him, which was somehow your fault. He knew he'd lose any confrontation with you, so he wouldn't let it come to that, so you were allowed no appeal. I think Kalua behaves like a spoiled, suspicious bully with a very small penis. Cowardly men like that are responsible for most of the wars and strife in this world. I really don't like that guy. |
|
| |
tonnie_rocca
Posts : 8986 Points : 10042 Join date : 2009-09-20 Location : Rome, Italy
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:30 am | |
| - skywriter wrote:
- The more I learn about Kalua, the more I dislike him. WAM, I think Kalua was threatened by you. You're a strong woman, and you speak your mind. You didn't defer to him or cajole him or flirt with him. Some men can't relate to women who don't fit into some sort of gender based relationship--mommy, confidant, flirt, whatever--and each provides some form of flattery and ego stroking. I think Kalua requires a lot of both from women. I'm guessing you just weren't deferential enough for him, which meant you were a threat to his authority, and feeling threatened probably offended his manhood. And then you took up with DJG's. Yes, well, he did too, but he's quite sure he didn't like it. But you liked it, and stayed, and they liked you. And his suck-up little moles (all women, betcha!) came back with stories about how we made fun of him, which was somehow your fault. He knew he'd lose any confrontation with you, so he wouldn't let it come to that, so you were allowed no appeal. I think Kalua behaves like a spoiled, suspicious bully with a very small penis. Cowardly men like that are responsible for most of the wars and strife in this world. I really don't like that guy.
Sky, you know how I love your writing... Beware of the anger of a woman. |
|
| |
Lovin' Every Minute
Posts : 5255 Points : 5473 Join date : 2009-09-22 Location : Connecticut, USA
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Sun Sep 25, 2011 12:04 pm | |
| [quote="skywriter"] - WAMcKinley wrote:
- TxTammy wrote:
- Reality Check....WAM must have committed the most horrendous crime!
__________________________________________________
Yes, certainly I must have. I wonder what it could have been. No one seems to want to talk with me about it. Kalua informed me at one point that when Paul Wood, the original owner of the forum, found out I had become a member at DJG's, he wanted me banned, then and there. I found that interesting as I had declared my intent in the staff room originally before I visited the first time-----and no one told me not to go. Equally mysterious is that Kalua was a member at DJG's for a while------and no one at the OF threatened HIM with a punishment. That no doubt had to do with a service he was providing there for the forum,---spying and reporting back. It all depends on who you are when it comes to what you can get away with---and if you're willing to engage in nefarious activities for "the cause." Maybe I wasn't ENOUGH of a criminal! Could that be it?? The more I learn about Kalua, the more I dislike him. WAM, I think Kalua was threatened by you. You're a strong woman, and you speak your mind. You didn't defer to him or cajole him or flirt with him. Some men can't relate to women who don't fit into some sort of gender based relationship--mommy, confidant, flirt, whatever--and each provides some form of flattery and ego stroking. I think Kalua requires a lot of both from women. I'm guessing you just weren't deferential enough for him, which meant you were a threat to his authority, and feeling threatened probably offended his manhood. And then you took up with DJG's. Yes, well, he did too, but he's quite sure he didn't like it. But you liked it, and stayed, and they liked you. And his suck-up little moles (all women, betcha!) came back with stories about how we made fun of him, which was somehow your fault. He knew he'd lose any confrontation with you, so he wouldn't let it come to that, so you were allowed no appeal. I think Kalua behaves like a spoiled, suspicious bully with a very small penis. Cowardly men like that are responsible for most of the wars and strife in this world. I really don't like that guy. I think this is true. My recollection of Staff dynamics during my brief period as a mod over there was exactly what you describe - several of the mods were in a semi-flirtatious relationship (all tongue in cheek, but flirtatious nonetheless) - and at least one was like a maternal figure. LEM didn't play that game - and for some reason that I never fully understood, WAM was never included at all. They maintained that she wasn't a 'team player' - and/or that her responses to things were inappropriate - despite the fact that others responded to similar situations in similar ways. I never quite 'got' it. |
|
| |
Admin Admin
Posts : 16272 Points : 19536 Join date : 2009-09-19
| |
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:39 pm | |
| - TxTammy wrote:
- Reality Check....WAM must have committed the most horrendous crime!
Shame on you WAM! You should hire LEM to appeal the appeal.
Earth to SBFII! You should be ashamed of getting rid of members that way! They are cowards. Nuff Said! |
|
| |
johnnycake
Posts : 2554 Points : 2591 Join date : 2010-05-24 Location : Cambridge
| |
| |
Lovin' Every Minute
Posts : 5255 Points : 5473 Join date : 2009-09-22 Location : Connecticut, USA
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Thu Sep 29, 2011 2:01 pm | |
| |
|
| |
johnnycake
Posts : 2554 Points : 2591 Join date : 2010-05-24 Location : Cambridge
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:46 pm | |
| |
|
| |
LMiller4Susan
Posts : 891 Points : 908 Join date : 2011-06-15 Location : NY
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Thu Sep 29, 2011 9:24 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:04 am | |
| - fudgemeister wrote:
- WAMcKinley wrote:
- LMiller4Susan wrote:
- Anyone who says Susan Boyle has to be married before she can sing romantic songs is a moron right there.
______________________________________________________
Who said that?? It has been reported that Ponylady posted that. A lot of fans have said that she can't sing about falling ln love, or having songs about love or romance in them until she's experienced it. they are all hypocrites when it comes to CMAR, she sings that full of lust and it's sexy. But when she sings about romance, they call it her little girl voice. |
|
| |
fudgemeister
Posts : 83742 Points : 89806 Join date : 2010-10-25 Age : 74 Location : NYS
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! Wed Dec 14, 2011 11:30 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Ponylady Will Never Work! | |
| |
|
| |
| Ponylady Will Never Work! | |
|