Who is right PickledTink??

On 1-14-11 PickledTink opened a thread called RE: Charity Donation. She claimed emphatically that she did not have access to the bank account, the checkbook, or the paypal account! Yet, on 3-2-11 in the thread about the Financial report ending January, 2011, Truusbuist stated that PickledTink DID have access to these things! So, PickledTink, who is right, you or Truusbuist??

PickledTink, you stated in your "Enough Is Enough" thread the following," Asking questions in a polite manner is never discouraged." Therefore, PLEASE post your response to my question in the SBFII forum. I await your reply. Thank you.

fudgemeister wrote:

On 1-14-11 PickledTink opened a thread called RE: Charity Donation. She claimed emphatically that she did not have access to the bank account, the checkbook, or the paypal account! Yet, on 3-2-11 in the thread about the Financial report ending January, 2011, Truusbuist stated that PickledTink DID have access to these things! So, PickledTink, who is right, you or Truusbuist??

Fudge if you cannot get that answer from PT the person who should know is Cicichi since she is the treasurer. She should know who has access or not? I find this strange that a board member does not know and therefore there is the discrepancy between PT statement and Truusbuist. One of the two is giving false information...

whisper wrote:

fudgemeister wrote:

On 1-14-11 PickledTink opened a thread called RE: Charity Donation. She claimed emphatically that she did not have access to the bank account, the checkbook, or the paypal account! Yet, on 3-2-11 in the thread about the Financial report ending January, 2011, Truusbuist stated that PickledTink DID have access to these things! So, PickledTink, who is right, you or Truusbuist??

Fudge if you cannot get that answer from PT the person who should know is Cicichi since she is the treasurer. She should know who has access or not? I find this strange that a board member does not know and therefore there is the discrepancy between PT statement and Truusbuist. One of the two is giving false information...

I am certain that cicichi will not respond to me since I posted her pms to me in the guest forum.

now we know why PT felt guilty enough to pay the charity money. I don't think I am wrong when I asked if they used that money illegally. I still question till this day if they used it...
I was told by Special K himself that it was liable so I asked Chris to remove said post on her blog, and Special K threatened me with banning for posting a question on a blog. And he said he would ban me by ISP and IP...

They are criminals. And liars.

I offer my opponents a bargain: if they will stop telling lies about us, I will stop telling the truth about them. ~Adlai Stevenson, campaign speech, 1952

Sassyone wrote:

now we know why PT felt guilty enough to pay the charity money. I don't think I am wrong when I asked if they used that money illegally. I still question till this day if they used it...
I was told by Special K himself that it was liable so I asked Chris to remove said post on her blog, and Special K threatened me with banning for posting a question on a blog. And he said he would ban me by ISP and IP...

They are criminals. And liars.

Maybe wielding his "powers" (snort) is his preferred method of curing erectile dysfunction.

Toplass wrote:

Sassyone wrote:

now we know why PT felt guilty enough to pay the charity money. I don't think I am wrong when I asked if they used that money illegally. I still question till this day if they used it...
I was told by Special K himself that it was liable so I asked Chris to remove said post on her blog, and Special K threatened me with banning for posting a question on a blog. And he said he would ban me by ISP and IP...

They are criminals. And liars.

Maybe wielding his "powers" (snort) is his preferred method of curing erectile dysfunction.

whisper wrote:

fudgemeister wrote:

On 1-14-11 PickledTink opened a thread called RE: Charity Donation. She claimed emphatically that she did not have access to the bank account, the checkbook, or the paypal account! Yet, on 3-2-11 in the thread about the Financial report ending January, 2011, Truusbuist stated that PickledTink DID have access to these things! So, PickledTink, who is right, you or Truusbuist??

Fudge if you cannot get that answer from PT the person who should know is Cicichi since she is the treasurer. She should know who has access or not? I find this strange that a board member does not know and therefore there is the discrepancy between PT statement and Truusbuist. One of the two is giving false information...

Cicichi is now permanently ensconced with the pack...do not expect anything coming from her that has not been thoroughly scrutinized and rubberstamped by Kalua and Pickled.

Sassyone wrote:

now we know why PT felt guilty enough to pay the charity money. I don't think I am wrong when I asked if they used that money illegally. I still question till this day if they used it...
I was told by Special K himself that it was liable so I asked Chris to remove said post on her blog, and Special K threatened me with banning for posting a question on a blog. And he said he would ban me by ISP and IP...

They are criminals. And liars.

So can someone explain to me, a person who doesn't want to expend the energy to even think about their antics, how can they punish someone from their forum for posting on another forum or chat? What makes them think that is legal? Aren't they a U.S. non-profit? Or why is it they have to have spies on other forums? Begs me to question what they have to hide or who are they trying to control? Susan? If that is the case, I'm extremely afraid for Susan. Is it normal to expend such energy in managing a fansite?

fudgemeister wrote:

I offer my opponents a bargain: if they will stop telling lies about us, I will stop telling the truth about them. ~Adlai Stevenson, campaign speech, 1952

A perfectly apt and fitting quote.