Suboleaks: What are the odds?

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:19 pm

sucanfun wrote:

Clix Pix wrote:: I thought we had agreed that there was not going to be any public speculation about the identity of this new blogger?

I had not seen that discussed anywhere!!!!!!! If the person is anonymous, it invites speculation. Why is everyone being so defensive?

That avatar could be used by anyone. I don't see what the big deal is. I don't see being defensive either. We don't know who wrote that stuff. I know the stalker who used it on me but that doesn't mean it is the same person. It could be anyone.

Guest

tonnie_rocca wrote:: Honestly, I would prefer that the writer of this blog were not anonymous, there is always something creepy about anonymity...

Isn't he or she allowed the right to privacy?

You have the right to choose to not read something if you don't trust it.

But, I go by two mottos: Trust No One, and The Truth Is out There.

Guest

fudgemeister wrote:

Admin wrote:: If this were SBFII they'd have made up a new rule by now and banned everyone!

They have reached the point where they do not even bother to make new rules! Firing

No, and they banned another person tonight, Sheri -- they had placed her on the old sanction, Time out and banned her as well.

Not only have they shot themselves in the foot, the word is out that it's heavily moderated site that doesn't even allow other fans to join other Susan Boyle Fan sites.

Posts : 3035 Points : 3216 Join date : 2009-09-20

The forum as a whole never agreed to keep the Subo Leaks identity secret. I suggested it and Clix agreed it was a good idea, probably because she had thought through the implications of speculating about it.

The reason I suggested it was to protect this person from the wrath of EW. The reason they have not revealed their name is most likely because they do not want the repercussions that would follow; i.e. time out and banning. Even if we do not know for sure, I would rather not give EW a short list of people who we think it may be.

If they actually have information, and they certainly appear to, I would rather that they keep blogging. That is more important to me than speculating about their identity.

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:18 pm

Agreed, Knudt! I guess I didn't word my other post very well, in that I implied that this entire forum had agreed not to speculate on the mystery blogger's identity. Sorry about that!

Anyway, whoever this person is I am sure that they would prefer to keep their identity secret or they would have put their name out there in the first place. The fact that they didn't is their responsibility and their decision and we're all just going to live with that, right? Obviously this individual has his or her own reasons for not revealing himself or herself.

Rather than wasting much time speculating on the blogger's identity, definitely we should all be reflecting on some of the things he or she is blogging about and the revelations coming from that blog....... Some interesting food for thought there!

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:39 pm

I don't know who the blogger is but they seem to have interesting information. I just want to know what is truth and what is not. If there is truth to this person's blogs then I would say it is very disturbing. I just hope the truth comes out whatever it is.

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:56 pm

Clix Pix wrote:: Agreed, Knudt! I guess I didn't word my other post very well, in that I implied that this entire forum had agreed not to speculate on the mystery blogger's identity. Sorry about that!

Anyway, whoever this person is I am sure that they would prefer to keep their identity secret or they would have put their name out there in the first place. The fact that they didn't is their responsibility and their decision and we're all just going to live with that, right? Obviously this individual has his or her own reasons for not revealing himself or herself.

Rather than wasting much time speculating on the blogger's identity, definitely we should all be reflecting on some of the things he or she is blogging about and the revelations coming from that blog....... Some interesting food for thought there!

That's a pretty safe bet!!! (ducks & hides under the furniture . . . hiding

)

(ETA - the piss-taking is starting to seep over into the Guest section . . . affraid

)

Posts : 13446 Points : 13780 Join date : 2011-02-02

I feel each person has a right to speculate as much as we wish. This is a free country . DJG is not the controlling type who will want to control our thoughts. Ha ha ha not like some ego driven control freaks. Cool

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:13 pm

OK, I'll clear up some speculation right now: the mystery blogger is..........

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Not me! ROFL

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:20 pm

It is difficult enough to get people to believe a named blogger (HAHA--as if we USE our REAL names). Everyone scoffs at an anonymous one. I have been reading ew quite a lot since the revelations from djg, sassy ,and anon. have come out. It seems that certain people who WERE named in those revelations are going about there business as if there were NO revelations! If I were persons that had been named in theblogs, I would at least be asking some vital questions through threads! Unfortunately, the revealers are being dismissed as either crazy, pissed off, or disgruntled people with a vendetta! I must be too idealistic to think that the hardcores over there might ever see or understand the truth!

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:21 pm

Well. I am so glad you made that clear Clix.

Oh, by the way, it isn't me either. I just want to make that very clear.

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:23 pm

mdillow31 wrote:: Well. I am so glad you made that clear Clix.

Oh, by the way, it isn't me either. I just want to make that very clear.

Ditto for me! Fudgemeister, anonymous????? laughfloor

Guest

fudgemeister wrote:

mdillow31 wrote:: Well. I am so glad you made that clear Clix.

Oh, by the way, it isn't me either. I just want to make that very clear.

Ditto for me! Fudgemeister, anonymous????? laughfloor

Even if you went anon, we'd know from the 'fudge splatter' on the walls Basketball

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:13 pm

bibi_36 wrote:: Even if you went anon, we'd know from the 'fudge splatter' on the walls

___________________________________________________________

Well, he CLAIMS it's fudge, anyhow!!

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:16 pm

Tsk, tsk, WAM!!!!!!

Guest

Sassyone wrote:

fudgemeister wrote:

Admin wrote:: If this were SBFII they'd have made up a new rule by now and banned everyone!

They have reached the point where they do not even bother to make new rules! Firing

No, and they banned another person tonight, Sheri -- they had placed her on the old sanction, Time out and banned her as well.

Not only have they shot themselves in the foot, the word is out that it's heavily moderated site that doesn't even allow other fans to join other Susan Boyle Fan sites.

Just out of curiosity what is it exactly that the heretical Sheri said that caused them to ban her. Had she possibly uttered some truths that EW did not want aired!

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:04 pm

WAMcKinley wrote:

bibi_36 wrote:: Even if you went anon, we'd know from the 'fudge splatter' on the walls

___________________________________________________________

Well, he CLAIMS it's fudge, anyhow!!

Depends.......what color is the splatter? Or is it colorless? laughcry

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:06 pm

YAK YAK YAK - to you all!!!! Sick

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:13 pm

feistyfilly wrote:: Just out of curiosity what is it exactly that the heretical Sheri said that caused them to ban her. Had she possibly uttered some truths that EW did not want aired!

_________________________________________________________

Who is Sheri? Does she have another name EW?? Yes, I imagine she told the truth in some form over there---and that was the end of her.

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:20 pm

I was going to ask that, too, WAM. She must've come along after my time there as that name doesn't sound familiar to me at all. Just had a thought: since we are in the Guest Forum it might be more appropriate NOT to share this Sheri's identity in this part of the forum (if indeed she is someone already known to us under a different name)....

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:25 pm

To the PMs, then. Sheri, whoever she is, has enough problems already w/o our adding to them.

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:16 am

I repeat that I don't like the style of that blog, it's agressive and destructive, and too much info is thrown around that nobody outside the SBFII inner circles could have known.

This leaks affair can point two ways: or it is aimed against the SBFII management (as might seem at first and second glance), or (what I tend too think now) aimed indirectly against someone/group already suspected of wanting to crash SBFII (which I know is not true!!), by "impersonating" them... Suspect

Guest

tonnie_rocca wrote:: I repeat that I don't like the style of that blog, it's agressive and destructive, and too much info is thrown around that nobody should know apart from the SBFII inner circles.

This leaks affair can point two ways: or it is aimed against the SBFII management (as might seem at first and second glance), or (what I tend too think now) aimed indirectly against someone/group already suspected of wanting to crash SBFII (which I know is not true!!), by "impersonating" them...

Tonnie, I was very surprised to see that msn transcript, but those behind the alternative investigation are planning on revealing a lot too, so, brace yourself.

As for your second theory, people may choose to think that, but I don't lean that way. The negativity you refer to is so distilled and fine grained I don't think it's likely to be fake, but more symptomatic of the blogger being some aggrieved individual who is 'getting back'.

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:40 pm

My original thinking on the blogger that it was someone who was very upset and had inside info on the Admin bunch at SBFII but I guess only future writings might give us more insight to it. Or I hope it does. I am just for the truth coming out.

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:32 am

The blog has been updated today with the pickled one's dairy

Click here to view

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:41 am

Toplass wrote:: The blog has been updated today with the pickled one's dairy

Click here to view

It's very funny, but I'm not buying that it's for real. Suspect

Not enough misspellings and grammatical errors . . . . . geek

ETA: Best line: "[Susan] enjoyed all the attention even when it seemed like she didn't." LOL!!

Admin Posts : 16277 Points : 19545 Join date : 2009-09-19

Toplass wrote:: The blog has been updated today with the pickled one's dairy

Click here to view

Oh really? She sells milk and cheese and all that kind of stuff then?! Wink

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:59 am

Admin wrote:

Toplass wrote:: The blog has been updated today with the pickled one's dairy

Click here to view

Oh really? She sells milk and cheese and all that kind of stuff then?! Wink

Don't you be making fun of me matey's spelling. It was an intentional attempt at humor, spoofing the pickled one's spelling patterns. Firing

Do we have to explain everything to you??? Evil or Very Mad

Posts : 10861 Points : 11460 Join date : 2009-10-09

Really enjoyed this one ROFL

very apt!!!

Admin Posts : 16277 Points : 19545 Join date : 2009-09-19

Lovin' Every Minute wrote:

Admin wrote:

Toplass wrote:: The blog has been updated today with the pickled one's dairy

Click here to view

Oh really? She sells milk and cheese and all that kind of stuff then?! Wink

Don't you be making fun of me matey's spelling. It was an intentional attempt at humor, spoofing the pickled one's spelling patterns. Firing

Do we have to explain everything to you??? Evil or Very Mad

Yeah, and I'm Pickled Lady's and Krapoola's secret love child! Twisted2

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Sat Feb 26, 2011 12:14 pm

Lovin' Every Minute wrote:

Admin wrote:

Toplass wrote:: The blog has been updated today with the pickled one's dairy

Click here to view

Oh really? She sells milk and cheese and all that kind of stuff then?! Wink

Don't you be making fun of me matey's spelling. It was an intentional attempt at humor, spoofing the pickled one's spelling patterns. Firing

Do we have to explain everything to you??? Evil or Very Mad

Cheezus I am getting worse at spelling and grammar by the day. Maybe I am turning into a pickle!! affraid

Thanks for covering me LEM but this was one occasion that I wasn't taking the pi$$ Rolling Eyes

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Sat Feb 26, 2011 12:15 pm

Admin wrote:

Lovin' Every Minute wrote:

Admin wrote:

Toplass wrote:: The blog has been updated today with the pickled one's dairy

Click here to view

Oh really? She sells milk and cheese and all that kind of stuff then?! Wink

Don't you be making fun of me matey's spelling. It was an intentional attempt at humor, spoofing the pickled one's spelling patterns. Firing

Do we have to explain everything to you??? Evil or Very Mad

Yeah, and I'm Pickled Lady's and Krapoola's secret love child! Twisted2

Yeah, not buying that one either. We all know Krapoola (Carla?) is dangly-challenged, hence making that an impossibility. Do we have to explain how luv-babies are made??? confused

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Sat Feb 26, 2011 12:17 pm

Toplass wrote:

Lovin' Every Minute wrote:

Admin wrote:

Toplass wrote:: The blog has been updated today with the pickled one's dairy

Click here to view

Oh really? She sells milk and cheese and all that kind of stuff then?! Wink

Don't you be making fun of me matey's spelling. It was an intentional attempt at humor, spoofing the pickled one's spelling patterns. Firing

Do we have to explain everything to you??? Evil or Very Mad

Cheezus I am getting worse at spelling and grammar by the day. Maybe I am turning into a pickle!! affraid

Thanks for covering me LEM but this was one occasion that I wasn't taking the pi$$ Rolling Eyes

Jeez Louise mate I went to the mat for ya on that one and now there you go admitting it. geek

Admin Posts : 16277 Points : 19545 Join date : 2009-09-19

Lovin' Every Minute wrote:: Yeah, not buying that one either. We all know Krapoola (Carla?) is dangly-challenged, hence making that an impossibility. Do we have to explain how luv-babies are made???

So Krapoola is actually Krapooletta? affraid

Subject: Re: Suboleaks: What are the odds? Sat Feb 26, 2011 12:58 pm

Admin wrote:

Lovin' Every Minute wrote:: Yeah, not buying that one either. We all know Krapoola (Carla?) is dangly-challenged, hence making that an impossibility. Do we have to explain how luv-babies are made???

So Krapoola is actually Krapooletta? affraid

In an earlier discussion of Krapoola's annonymous state I opined that not only do we not know where Krapoola really resides (as in, continent), but who knows for sure whether Carlos is really Carlos? For all we know, Carlos is in fact Carla (or a committee of people, or someone else's alter-ego - WTF knows?) - making a luv-baby with the pickle a biological impossibility. Unless the Pickle isn't in fact who (s)he would have us believe (s)he is - Suspect

The plot thickens . . . . Suspect