Selective Moderating

WAMcKinley wrote:

Gee, what in the world is happening at SBFII tonight?? Lots of wild, out-of-character posts and a whole fleet of mods watching the thread! Reminds me of another July a couple of years ago when all h--- broke loose over there. Strange night, indeed. Is there a full moon??-----

Yes. Strange goings on. Interesting how a board member can post a downright deplorable response to a member who posted a quote, and naturally gets away with it with no deletion and no sanction. As I have ALWAYS said--favoritism reigns supreme over there.

Well, the mods have gone to practice walking on water, and the members have gone for an IQ test!

Could someone please explain to me how the rudeness rule works when there was a reference to "two year olds" and "sippy cups" concerning yesterday's activities and evidently that is acceptable?? BTW, I flagged both.

bernicer wrote:

Could someone please explain to me how the rudeness rule works when there was a reference to "two year olds" and "sippy cups" concerning yesterday's activities and evidently that is acceptable?? BTW, I flagged both.

It depends on who is being rude.

So why was Donna T put on pre-mod, and the board member and "sippy cup" poster were not??

I have 2 things to say about the disgusting goings on---blech and ptouie!

fudgemeister wrote:

I have 2 things to say about the disgusting goings on---blech and ptouie!

__________________________________________________________________

If that's a direct quote, you might need to cite your source!---------

Circlette is up to her neck in sand!! She now operates a bulldozer with all the movement of posts into the sandbox. Her new thing--complaining about the posts about the US presidential debate and its possible effect on DWTS that night. HELLLLLOOOOO!!! That is of concern to ALL fans, even the international ones. This woman has learned her job TOO well over there!!

fudgemeister wrote:

Circlette is up to her neck in sand!! She now operates a bulldozer with all the movement of posts into the sandbox. Her new thing--complaining about the posts about the US presidential debate and its possible effect on DWTS that night. HELLLLLOOOOO!!! That is of concern to ALL fans, even the international ones. This woman has learned her job TOO well over there!!

____________________________________________________________

Sandbox?? I thought it was a litterbox from the frequency at which it gets emptied!---

Another example of selective moderating at SBFII. We had 10 members put on pre-moderation for NO reason. Yet, they have a member there pulling childish temper tantrums, opening threads and putting down moderators, yet nothing happens to him! Rules there are a joke!

I'll have to agree with you there, Fudge. None of us would have been able to get away with that kind of foolishness,----nor should anyone be permitted to. I don't see disability there. It's more like clever, contrived manipulation of a forum.

How many resignations has he made now?? And yet, there will still be some jumping in to beg him to stay. It's a real soap opera!!

Well he has quit again!!! Anyone want to bet when he comes back??

I think that his heart will have a change of heart due to heartbreak. It is enough to give you heartburn. Am I being heartless?

I'll be generous and give him 3 days to return to the EW forum.

pancake wrote:

I'll be generous and give him 3 days to return to the EW forum.

it has never taken him that long to come back. I think his personal best is 10 hours

WAMcKinley wrote:

I'll have to agree with you there, Fudge. None of us would have been able to get away with that kind of foolishness,----nor should anyone be permitted to. I don't see disability there. It's more like clever, contrived manipulation of a forum.

How many resignations has he made now?? And yet, there will still be some jumping in to beg him to stay. It's a real soap opera!!

And you were banned.....a big WOW!
As if you were a threat!
Boggles the mind!

TxTammy wrote:

WAMcKinley wrote:

I'll have to agree with you there, Fudge. None of us would have been able to get away with that kind of foolishness,----nor should anyone be permitted to. I don't see disability there. It's more like clever, contrived manipulation of a forum.

How many resignations has he made now?? And yet, there will still be some jumping in to beg him to stay. It's a real soap opera!!

And you were banned.....a big WOW!
As if you were a threat!
Boggles the mind!

It is sad isn't it. They get rid of a good member and poster like WAM, and they do everything in the world to keep a spoiled brat on the forum, a person who ACTUALLY breaks the rules.

fudgemeister wrote:

TxTammy wrote:

WAMcKinley wrote:

I'll have to agree with you there, Fudge. None of us would have been able to get away with that kind of foolishness,----nor should anyone be permitted to. I don't see disability there. It's more like clever, contrived manipulation of a forum.

How many resignations has he made now?? And yet, there will still be some jumping in to beg him to stay. It's a real soap opera!!

And you were banned.....a big WOW!
As if you were a threat!
Boggles the mind!

It is sad isn't it. They get rid of a good member and poster like WAM, and they do everything in the world to keep a spoiled brat on the forum, a person who ACTUALLY breaks the rules.

Never mind that...she was a moderator, one of the best, since the forum first started and did nothing to get banned. Period! Makes one wonder who rules the roost there and why WAM is not reinstated!

TxTammy wrote:

fudgemeister wrote:

TxTammy wrote:

WAMcKinley wrote:

I'll have to agree with you there, Fudge. None of us would have been able to get away with that kind of foolishness,----nor should anyone be permitted to. I don't see disability there. It's more like clever, contrived manipulation of a forum.

How many resignations has he made now?? And yet, there will still be some jumping in to beg him to stay. It's a real soap opera!!

And you were banned.....a big WOW!
As if you were a threat!
Boggles the mind!

It is sad isn't it. They get rid of a good member and poster like WAM, and they do everything in the world to keep a spoiled brat on the forum, a person who ACTUALLY breaks the rules.

Never mind that...she was a moderator, one of the best, since the forum first started and did nothing to get banned. Period! Makes one wonder who rules the roost there and why WAM is not reinstated!

We know who........enough said.

Maybe WAM doesn't wish to be reinstated.------

The childish member has posted he has quit again. He does this every 3 days or so. How come mods/admin cannot ban THIS guy--they have had no trouble in the past doing it to dozens and dozens of members. He WANTS to quit---SHOW HIM THE DOOR ALREADY!!!!!

fudgemeister wrote:

The childish member has posted he has quit again. He does this every 3 days or so. How come mods/admin cannot ban THIS guy--they have had no trouble in the past doing it to dozens and dozens of members. He WANTS to quit---SHOW HIM THE DOOR ALREADY!!!!!

It's a revolving door, so he can always come back.

He has just opened his 3rd thread of the day. Are there no sane rational members there to ask admin to stop this foolishness??

fudgemeister wrote:

He has just opened his 3rd thread of the day. Are there no sane rational members there to ask admin to stop this foolishness??

_______________________________________________________________

Wouldn't you think that constant and continual disruption of the forum would be grounds for censure of some kind?? Yet he is permitted to go on and on with these selfish outbursts. No one else would get away with behavior like that,----nor should they. Glad we don't have to put up with that kind of silliness over here!!

WAMcKinley wrote:

fudgemeister wrote:

He has just opened his 3rd thread of the day. Are there no sane rational members there to ask admin to stop this foolishness??

_______________________________________________________________

Wouldn't you think that constant and continual disruption of the forum would be grounds for censure of some kind?? Yet he is permitted to go on and on with these selfish outbursts. No one else would get away with behavior like that,----nor should they. Glad we don't have to put up with that kind of silliness over here!!

well.....if he gets booted from EW he might just be showing up over here!

nevermore wrote:

WAMcKinley wrote:

fudgemeister wrote:

He has just opened his 3rd thread of the day. Are there no sane rational members there to ask admin to stop this foolishness??

_______________________________________________________________

Wouldn't you think that constant and continual disruption of the forum would be grounds for censure of some kind?? Yet he is permitted to go on and on with these selfish outbursts. No one else would get away with behavior like that,----nor should they. Glad we don't have to put up with that kind of silliness over here!!

well.....if he gets booted from EW he might just be showing up over here!

________________________________________________________________

Fortunately, our administration has a "fool-proof" screening system.-------

WAMcKinley wrote:

nevermore wrote:

WAMcKinley wrote:

fudgemeister wrote:

He has just opened his 3rd thread of the day. Are there no sane rational members there to ask admin to stop this foolishness??

_______________________________________________________________

Wouldn't you think that constant and continual disruption of the forum would be grounds for censure of some kind?? Yet he is permitted to go on and on with these selfish outbursts. No one else would get away with behavior like that,----nor should they. Glad we don't have to put up with that kind of silliness over here!!

well.....if he gets booted from EW he might just be showing up over here!

________________________________________________________________

Fortunately, our administration has a "fool-proof" screening system.-------

Yeah, the old trusty Susahumor crapometer!

I see the arrow has detected the appropriate range for the "master manipulator!!" The system never fails!!