Anonymous Blogger Posts New Entry....

Clix Pix wrote:

http://suboleaks.blogspot.com/2011_03_01_archive.html

I'm still curious who the h*ll is the author of these blogs, he/she is not stupid, he/she knows what he/she speaks about, and (I think) it should be a person we all know.

And still, for some skin-feeling reason, I don't like this blog...

I'm not quite sure of all the ins-and-outs of the situation that is discussed in the blog, but I guess that's because I haven't been around at EW for a long time now -- actually, just about a year, I think. Regardless, the implications in this particular blog entry are quite disturbing, very disturbing indeed......

As for "liking the blog," well, I don't think the idea is that any of us should like any of the revelations we've been seeing on any of the blogs! Some ugly details coming to light here and they sure don't make the folks at EW or their actions very likeable....

I posted this in the private section already but to save the SBFII spy time, I'll post it here. After this latest entry, I believe this blogger to be in contact with Zenneo, Black Coffee, Orgonon and the many other aliases of the cyber-bully-troll-stalker. I received several emails from Zenneo about this fan stalking Susan, buying information etc. almost verbatum of what was said in this blog, including that Tink had contacted Scotland Yard. Good I say, if someone is intruding on Susan's life enough to get a copy of her birth certificate and medical records, they should be reported to Scotland Yard and Susan's team.

The fan in question, has taken a lot of heat from this creep or as Dyebat called him deatheater. She does not deserve it. I fell for it because my first meeting with this fan was not impressive for me. Upon my second meeting of her I completely changed my mind. I do apologize to you, the fan, for thinking ill of you.

I also find it interesting that this blogger is bringing up known deatheater things. I would suggest this blogger identify these conversations as being deatheater started. If the point is to show the inconsistncy of SBFII admin, point that out.

I'm with you Tonnie something doesn't feel right about this blogger. I sense a lot of anger toward SBFII but being nameless seems strange, kind of diminishes the point they are trying to make. They can say whatever they want about us, none of it true like wanting to take over their forum, but we use our names.

Clix Pix wrote:

(..) As for "liking the blog," well, I don't think the idea is that any of us should like any of the revelations we've been seeing on any of the blogs! Some ugly details coming to light here and they sure don't make the folks at EW or their actions very likeable....

I mean to say, Clix, that I ever less like this blogger, there is something fishy about him/her, I agree with Baja at this point...

I can't take this blog seriously while the blogger is posting anonymously either. It not only diminishes their points but also casts suspicion on others.

Susan Boyle fans have been taken for fools before now. Anonymous blogs would seem an easy way for disempowered trolls to continue their trollery.

bajaraquel wrote:

I posted this in the private section already but to save the SBFII spy time, I'll post it here. After this latest entry, I believe this blogger to be in contact with Zenneo, Black Coffee, Orgonon and the many other aliases of the cyber-bully-troll-stalker. I received several emails from Zenneo about this fan stalking Susan, buying information etc. almost verbatum of what was said in this blog, including that Tink had contacted Scotland Yard. Good I say, if someone is intruding on Susan's life enough to get a copy of her birth certificate and medical records, they should be reported to Scotland Yard and Susan's team.

The fan in question, has taken a lot of heat from this creep or as Dyebat called him deatheater. She does not deserve it. I fell for it because my first meeting with this fan was not impressive for me. Upon my second meeting of her I completely changed my mind. I do apologize to you, the fan, for thinking ill of you.

I also find it interesting that this blogger is bringing up known deatheater things. I would suggest this blogger identify these conversations as being deatheater started. If the point is to show the inconsistncy of SBFII admin, point that out.

I'm with you Tonnie something doesn't feel right about this blogger. I sense a lot of anger toward SBFII but being nameless seems strange, kind of diminishes the point they are trying to make. They can say whatever they want about us, none of it true like wanting to take over their forum, but we use our names.

NO, I can tell you this person is not in contact with the troll. Trust me on this.

New blog posted today:-

http://suboleaks.blogspot.com/2011/03/identity-crisis.html

xjsarah wrote:

New blog posted today:-

http://suboleaks.blogspot.com/2011/03/identity-crisis.html

I thought it was funny.

It amused me

Hate to say it, but I think what Anon. is doing is opposite to what he/she is trying to accomplish! Or maybe THAT IS THE PLAN!!! DOUBLE AGENT ANYONE???

I had to laugh despite myself.

I thought it was funny, too -- I especially like the references to the various people that the mystery blogger would like to be!

As for the list of who it's not..... Well, gee, and here I was just SURE it was the Easter Bunny!!!!

Clix Pix wrote:

I thought it was funny, too -- I especially like the references to the various people that the mystery blogger would like to be!

As for the list of who it's not..... Well, gee, and here I was just SURE it was the Easter Bunny!!!!

No, we all know it's the Tooth Fairy!

raggy wrote:

Admin wrote:

Clix Pix wrote:

I thought it was funny, too -- I especially like the references to the various people that the mystery blogger would like to be!

As for the list of who it's not..... Well, gee, and here I was just SURE it was the Easter Bunny!!!!

No, we all know it's the Tooth Fairy!

You're all wrong......it's SUSAN! She apparently has nothing better to do than sit around reading ALL the forums, so why not? [Actually this most recent post does sound like her sense of humor.]

Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh I need the Tena Lady/Depends

Did I see you post somewhere that you weren't particularly humourous? Well that was a big fat lie

Toplass wrote:

raggy wrote:

Admin wrote:

Clix Pix wrote:

I thought it was funny, too -- I especially like the references to the various people that the mystery blogger would like to be!

As for the list of who it's not..... Well, gee, and here I was just SURE it was the Easter Bunny!!!!

No, we all know it's the Tooth Fairy!

You're all wrong......it's SUSAN! She apparently has nothing better to do than sit around reading ALL the forums, so why not? [Actually this most recent post does sound like her sense of humor.]

Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh I need the Tena Lady/Depends

Did I see you post somewhere that you weren't particularly humourous? Well that was a big fat lie

What can I say... butt..... send the Depends.

tonnie_rocca wrote:

Clix Pix wrote:

http://suboleaks.blogspot.com/2011_03_01_archive.html

I'm still curious who the h*ll is the author of these blogs, he/she is not stupid, he/she knows what he/she speaks about, and (I think) it should be a person we all know.

And still, for some skin-feeling reason, I don't like this blog...

then don't read it.

tonnie_rocca wrote:

Clix Pix wrote:

http://suboleaks.blogspot.com/2011_03_01_archive.html

I'm still curious who the h*ll is the author of these blogs, he/she is not stupid, he/she knows what he/she speaks about, and (I think) it should be a person we all know.

And still, for some skin-feeling reason, I don't like this blog...

Tonnie good for the skin-feelings It never is wrong...

mdillow31 wrote:

whisper wrote:

tonnie_rocca wrote:

Clix Pix wrote:

http://suboleaks.blogspot.com/2011_03_01_archive.html

I'm still curious who the h*ll is the author of these blogs, he/she is not stupid, he/she knows what he/she speaks about, and (I think) it should be a person we all know.

And still, for some skin-feeling reason, I don't like this blog...

Tonnie good for the skin-feelings It never is wrong...

I agree with Tonnie.

And I agree!

The nice part about this forum is that people don't all have to follow "the company line" and agree with each other. Here there is freedom of thought freely expressed and each individual here is respected for his or her opinion, whether or not someone else agrees. Opinions are freely shared and expressed and there is no stifling, no clamping-down from a dictatorial administration. That's a big difference from SBFII, a significant one.....

Clix Pix wrote:

The nice part about this forum is that people don't all have to follow "the company line" and agree with each other. Here there is freedom of thought freely expressed and each individual here is respected for his or her opinion, whether or not someone else agrees. Opinions are freely shared and expressed and there is no stifling, no clamping-down from a dictatorial administration. That's a big difference from SBFII, a significant one.....

Amen to that!!

fudgemeister wrote:

Clix Pix wrote:

The nice part about this forum is that people don't all have to follow "the company line" and agree with each other. Here there is freedom of thought freely expressed and each individual here is respected for his or her opinion, whether or not someone else agrees. Opinions are freely shared and expressed and there is no stifling, no clamping-down from a dictatorial administration. That's a big difference from SBFII, a significant one.....

Amen to that!!

Me too. That's why I agree with Tonnie.

I found it funny, she wanted to be the breed a psychologist and and a dentist, very appropiate for a susafanatic and a master in computers too
Another one with grandeur syndrome , well at least this one have a sense of humour you ought to take blogs activities with a pinch of salt and a couple of tequillas

I still agree with Tonnie but did smile at the Piers Morgan ones!

bajaraquel wrote:

I still agree with Tonnie but did smile at the Piers Morgan ones!

THAT is the biggest hint! Might be worth it to go through the DDB thread and find ALL the candidates who despise Piers. I would do it, but I will soon have no access. It always just takes good digging detective work. Any detectives out there? BTW, I do not like Piers; have written that a number of times, BUT I am NOT the blogger! My username has always been fine with me!

fudgemeister wrote:

bajaraquel wrote:

I still agree with Tonnie but did smile at the Piers Morgan ones!

THAT is the biggest hint! Might be worth it to go through the DDB thread and find ALL the candidates who despise Piers. I would do it, but I will soon have no access. It always just takes good digging detective work. Any detectives out there? BTW, I do not like Piers; have written that a number of times, BUT I am NOT the blogger! My username has always been fine with me!

I think that might be a long list.

knudt wrote:

fudgemeister wrote:

bajaraquel wrote:

I still agree with Tonnie but did smile at the Piers Morgan ones!

THAT is the biggest hint! Might be worth it to go through the DDB thread and find ALL the candidates who despise Piers. I would do it, but I will soon have no access. It always just takes good digging detective work. Any detectives out there? BTW, I do not like Piers; have written that a number of times, BUT I am NOT the blogger! My username has always been fine with me!

I think that might be a long list.

Knudt, I think you might be surprised. The few times i have been there it seemed that MOST liked him. It's a theory. Knudt, what do you think? Does being anonymous help his/her cause, or does it hurt it?

fudgemeister wrote:

Hate to say it, but I think what Anon. is doing is opposite to what he/she is trying to accomplish! Or maybe THAT IS THE PLAN!!! DOUBLE AGENT ANYONE???

Maybe it's PT and she's trying to discredit me or anyone that is from this forum?