Site Destruction?! -Do Not Blame Us!

---

EW needs us bad but rather bright people, particularly in cases of linguistic controversies, and I don't want to leave them in the dark: "in Fund" is the wrong translation of "in fondo", which means "after all". In Fund English is a difficult language and the google translator sometimes gives a hole (da buca = doesn't function)...

tonnie_rocca wrote:

---

EW needs us bad but rather bright people, particularly in cases of linguistic controversies, and I don't want to leave them in the dark: "in Fund" is the wrong translation of "in fondo", which means "after all". In Fund English is a difficult language and the google translator sometimes gives a hole (da buca = doesn't function)...

Maybe Judy can give you a special title as Mauro's Translator. Think of it, you will even get your own username color for the forum.

Memo to JudyO-- Better get a box of Crayola Crayons with 64 inside. That way you will have enough colors for all the new forum titles.

fudgemeister wrote:

Maybe Judy can give you a special title as Mauro's Translator. Think of it, you will even get your own username color for the forum.

Memo to JudyO-- Better get a box of Crayola Crayons with 64 inside. That way you will have enough colors for all the new forum titles.

There is for sure a tucked-away rule in the big book saying that perma-premodded people cannot fulfill such an honour. In case, I opt for a nice purple colour...

Permanent pre-moderation is a farce! Even people in prison get their sentence reduced by good behaviour and time served.
I have observed that posters there have acted much worse than anyone here that is on pre-mod. Think about it! Is it just about POWER?

Boss, I like the harp smiley (David's or not... ), can we have it, please??

tonnie_rocca wrote:

Boss, I like the harp smiley (David's or not... ), can we have it, please??

Yes you can!

Now the alleged loonies have to come running over to read this inane chatter just to see if we've said anything about them!

fudgemeister wrote:

tonnie_rocca wrote:

---

EW needs us bad but rather bright people, particularly in cases of linguistic controversies, and I don't want to leave them in the dark: "in Fund" is the wrong translation of "in fondo", which means "after all". In Fund English is a difficult language and the google translator sometimes gives a hole (da buca = doesn't function)...

Maybe Judy can give you a special title as Mauro's Translator. Think of it, you will even get your own username color for the forum.

Memo to JudyO-- Better get a box of Crayola Crayons with 64 inside. That way you will have enough colors for all the new forum titles.

Here we go--

I have titles that you can give individual colors for--- Yapdogs, Baiters, Missionaries, Tweet Responders---to name a few.

Oh, I forgot PonyLady---the Appelate Judge. Welllllll, maybe not, since given the WAM banning debacle, she will NEVER hear ANY appeal!

fudgemeister wrote:

tonnie_rocca wrote:

---

EW needs us bad but rather bright people, particularly in cases of linguistic controversies, and I don't want to leave them in the dark: "in Fund" is the wrong translation of "in fondo", which means "after all". In Fund English is a difficult language and the google translator sometimes gives a hole (da buca = doesn't function)...

Maybe Judy can give you a special title as Mauro's Translator. Think of it, you will even get your own username color for the forum.

Memo to JudyO-- Better get a box of Crayola Crayons with 64 inside. That way you will have enough colors for all the new forum titles.

They need those to write out their board meeting minutes! Or at least they would if their board meeting minutes were more than 3 lines long!

Oooo, Oooo,----I like that peachy pink in the front row right. That can be for "Former-Mods,-Banned-and-Damned-Forever-For-Refusing-To-Go-Along-With-Staff-Reprisals-Toward-Members-AND-Having/Expressing-Opinions-Counter-To-Company-Policy." I think that would include at least a few of us here!!-------------

WAMcKinley wrote:

Oooo, Oooo,----I like that peachy pink in the front row right. That can be for "Former-Mods,-Banned-and-Damned-Forever-For-Refusing-To-Go-Along-With-Staff-Reprisals-Toward-Members-AND-Having/Expressing-Opinions-Counter-To-Company-Policy." I think that would include at least a few of us here!!-------------

And dark brown for the ass kissers of course!

Admin wrote:

WAMcKinley wrote:

Oooo, Oooo,----I like that peachy pink in the front row right. That can be for "Former-Mods,-Banned-and-Damned-Forever-For-Refusing-To-Go-Along-With-Staff-Reprisals-Toward-Members-AND-Having/Expressing-Opinions-Counter-To-Company-Policy." I think that would include at least a few of us here!!-------------

And dark brown for the ass kissers of course!

_____________________________________________________________

Better get a few extras of that shade!!

WAMcKinley wrote:

Admin wrote:

WAMcKinley wrote:

Oooo, Oooo,----I like that peachy pink in the front row right. That can be for "Former-Mods,-Banned-and-Damned-Forever-For-Refusing-To-Go-Along-With-Staff-Reprisals-Toward-Members-AND-Having/Expressing-Opinions-Counter-To-Company-Policy." I think that would include at least a few of us here!!-------------

And dark brown for the ass kissers of course!

_____________________________________________________________

Better get a few extras of that shade!!

A few??????

---

We have almost 200.000 posts, that's not so much less than just over 700.000...
It's almost 30 %, and that for such a small site compared to the BIG ONE.

GO DJGers GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

tonnie_rocca wrote:

---

We have almost 200.000 posts, that's not so much less than just over 700.000...
It's almost 30 %, and that for such a small site compared to the BIG ONE.

That's what you get when you delete 90% of the posts because you don't happen to agree with what people have posted. Those that are left are a load of sugary religious crap anyway.

Admin wrote:

tonnie_rocca wrote:

---

We have almost 200.000 posts, that's not so much less than just over 700.000...
It's almost 30 %, and that for such a small site compared to the BIG ONE.

That's what you get when you delete 90% of the posts because you don't happen to agree with what people have posted. Those that are left are a load of sugary religious crap anyway.

____________________________________________________________________

Grateful for your tolerance and forbearance, Boss!--------

Ditto to that, WAM!

---

Sandboxes will get closed when it rains and storms, right so...