permanent pre-moderation means also...

---

permanent pre-moderation means also:

- that you cannot vote on the ew banner poll (I'm truely not very interested...)

- that you are not allowed to view attached pictures.
Where are all these things actually written in the 10.000 rules???

Well if the new banners look anything like the crappy badly put together one that is currently up there they are not worth voting for anyway.

The current one is an insult to Susan

I assume they'll be mostly ripped off 'inspired' by other people's work. Ain't that right 'Dangly Bits' Bill?

Admin wrote:

I assume they'll be mostly ripped off 'inspired' by other people's work. Ain't that right 'Dangly Bits' Bill?

Anyway, all photo's used are surely copyrighted...

At least the present banner has original pics.

tonnie_rocca wrote:

Admin wrote:

I assume they'll be mostly ripped off 'inspired' by other people's work. Ain't that right 'Dangly Bits' Bill?

Anyway, all photo's used are surely copyrighted...

At least the present banner has original pics.

When have SBFII ever been worried about copyright? Oh, except then they tried to hide their failed Skype attempt. Then copyright was a big deal and they bullied every hosting company in existence to remove it. But, when they rip something off it's perfectly OK.

Admin wrote:

tonnie_rocca wrote:

Admin wrote:

I assume they'll be mostly ripped off 'inspired' by other people's work. Ain't that right 'Dangly Bits' Bill?

Anyway, all photo's used are surely copyrighted...

At least the present banner has original pics.

When have SBFII ever been worried about copyright? Oh, except then they tried to hide their failed Skype attempt. Then copyright was a big deal and they bullied every hosting company in existence to remove it. But, when they rip something off it's perfectly OK.

ETA: 46 banner voters up to now, what does that say about a.m. ew???? at least we have a standard to measure it again...

tonnie_rocca wrote:

---

permanent pre-moderation means also:

- that you cannot vote on the ew banner poll (I'm truely not very interested...)

- that you are not allowed to view attached pictures.
Where are all these things actually written in the 10.000 rules???

I am displaying righteous indignation......
The permanent ban is unfair really is. Where is forgiveness where is compassion where is love.??

There is a song a hymn I like "They know us by our love."

To love and show love that is what it means to be a Christian. How does someone recognize us, by our love nothing else. Love is what it is about. Who was the example? Whom do we follow?

Permanent pre-moderation is unfair specially to people like
Tonnie and TXTammy what have they done?
They are good people kind people and full of compassion people and most of all they have lots of love in their heart and give it freely.
I do not know who else was because they resigned after being pre-moderated.

To both of you and all who were pre-moderated.

whisper wrote:

To both of you and all who were pre-moderated.

Thanks my friend...

But I'm still a bad girl in DJG's guest forum, not to mention the horrible truths we share inside here , that's why...

I don't trust them anymore since a long time: double standards and lies in the higher ew echelons all over...

Remember how smoothly they got rid of Dyebat, Lchris and Citro???
Remember how the blogs were neglected??
Remember which threads have disappeared??

I do remember it all, they hijacked my forum... .

Oh, I have to go check out that banner vote thing so I can see whatever lousy crap billshite threw together and vote against it.

tonnie_rocca wrote:

whisper wrote:

To both of you and all who were pre-moderated.

Thanks my friend...

But I'm still a bad girl in DJG's guest forum, not to mention the horrible truths we share inside here , that's why...

I don't trust them anymore since a long time: double standards and lies in the higher ew echelons all over...

Remember how smoothly they got rid of Dyebat, Lchris and Citro???
Remember how the blogs were neglected??
Remember which threads have disappeared??

I do remember it all, they hijacked my forum... .

Yes I remember words fail me...
The truth people do not want to hear....
Still you did not deserve it my friend because you are a strong fan and admirer Susan greatly....
There is not such a think as real fan and not real fan. People do that one is not a real American , or real German, or real Christian because one does not think like they do.
You are real a real fan.....

We all are real Susan fans no matter what fan site.

tonnie_rocca wrote:

---

permanent pre-moderation means also:

- that you cannot vote on the ew banner poll (I'm truely not very interested...)

- that you are not allowed to view attached pictures.
Where are all these things actually written in the 10.000 rules???

Sucks, doesn't it.....and to think we did no worse than anyone else that is still there.

---

77 banner voters, 26 thank sayers, a lot o what a lot of members there...

tonnie_rocca wrote:

---

77 banner voters, 26 thank sayers, a lot o what a lot of members there...

I was one that voted...

nevermore wrote:

Oh, I have to go check out that banner vote thing so I can see whatever lousy crap billshite threw together and vote against it.

CB did not enter this competition!

fudgemeister wrote:

nevermore wrote:

Oh, I have to go check out that banner vote thing so I can see whatever lousy crap billshite threw together and vote against it.

CB did not enter this competition!

Could he not find anything to rip off as usual then?

---

Now 96 voters and 36 thanksayers, we are getting the stats...

Admin wrote:

fudgemeister wrote:

nevermore wrote:

Oh, I have to go check out that banner vote thing so I can see whatever lousy crap billshite threw together and vote against it.

CB did not enter this competition!

Could he not find anything to rip off as usual then?

No, he wanted to allow others to get the kudos!

I think they should use the photo of Susan hugging Angel. There are no copyright issues and I don't care what forum you belong to, that is a moving picture and the essence of Susan. There are enough private pictures of Susan so there shouldn't have to be any copy right violations, but then rules only apply to people they don't like.

Admin wrote:

fudgemeister wrote:

nevermore wrote:

Oh, I have to go check out that banner vote thing so I can see whatever lousy crap billshite threw together and vote against it.

CB did not enter this competition!

Could he not find anything to rip off as usual then?

Or maybe he's finally hearing us, and how he's not that good in the first place.

Sassyone wrote:

Admin wrote:

fudgemeister wrote:

nevermore wrote:

Oh, I have to go check out that banner vote thing so I can see whatever lousy crap billshite threw together and vote against it.

CB did not enter this competition!

Could he not find anything to rip off as usual then?

Or maybe he's finally hearing us, and how he's not that good in the first place.

But the girls all like CBill and his sick MSPaint skillz.

xeno wrote:

Sassyone wrote:

Admin wrote:

fudgemeister wrote:

nevermore wrote:

Oh, I have to go check out that banner vote thing so I can see whatever lousy crap billshite threw together and vote against it.

CB did not enter this competition!

Could he not find anything to rip off as usual then?

Or maybe he's finally hearing us, and how he's not that good in the first place.

But the girls all like CBill and his sick MSPaint skillz.

Well, of course, it strokes his ego.

xeno wrote:

Sassyone wrote:

Admin wrote:

fudgemeister wrote:

nevermore wrote:

Oh, I have to go check out that banner vote thing so I can see whatever lousy crap billshite threw together and vote against it.

CB did not enter this competition!

Could he not find anything to rip off as usual then?

Or maybe he's finally hearing us, and how he's not that good in the first place.

But the girls all like CBill and his sick MSPaint skillz.

---

Now 140 voters and 52 thanksayers... guys, that's the real active membership over there, in spite of the make believe...

tonnie_rocca wrote:

---

Now 140 voters and 52 thanksayers... guys, that's the real active membership over there, in spite of the make believe...

Yes, pretty much same # as when they voted on the board and the bylaws. Where are the THOUSANDS!?

tonnie_rocca wrote:

---

Now 140 voters and 52 thanksayers... guys, that's the real active membership over there, in spite of the make believe...

Yes, that's supposed to rep the 50,000 or 60,000, active members that are all religious and Texas line dancing fans.

---

The great premoderation expulsion has happened almost a year ago...

It turns out now that you are also excluded from voting in a poll.

"You may not vote on this poll", site management stinks...

Voters now around 160, a familiar number.

What kind of poll? One voting on internal matters? External matters? I wouldn't think that a poll coming from there would have much value to anyone outside that small group anyway.......

Clix Pix wrote:

What kind of poll? One voting on internal matters? External matters? I wouldn't think that a poll coming from there would have much value to anyone outside that small group anyway.......

The Andy Stinky poll.

Yes, it would appear that the same old ultra-conservative wealthy religious 'ladies who lunch' have again been approached for their opinions on what CD#4 should contain. Given that these people haven't bought any music since about 1940-something, it's obvious that they'll ask for the same old stuff: hymns, more hymns, and yet more hymns. All slowed down to a snails pace of course, so their ear trumpets don't explode with all the excitement! Their opinions didn't exactly help CD#3 (it's this same crowd who insisted everything was slowed to a dirge), so why they should have input on CD#4 is beyond me.

Admin wrote:

Yes, it would appear that the same old ultra-conservative wealthy religious 'ladies who lunch' have again been approached for their opinions on what CD#4 should contain. Given that these people haven't bought any music since about 1940-something, it's obvious that they'll ask for the same old stuff: hymns, more hymns, and yet more hymns. All slowed down to a snails pace of course, so their ear trumpets don't explode with all the excitement! Their opinions didn't exactly help CD#3 (it's this same crowd who insisted everything was slowed to a dirge), so why they should have input on CD#4 is beyond me.

Is it because Susan and her team actually believe there are really diverse fans there? - well there would be if the site had 5,000 (or is that 50,000?) truly active members instead of about 2-300 and falling. I shall despair if the next CD again has Susan singing according to Macs arrangements instead of singing songs that suit her glorious voice!

Emmylou wrote:

Admin wrote:

Yes, it would appear that the same old ultra-conservative wealthy religious 'ladies who lunch' have again been approached for their opinions on what CD#4 should contain. Given that these people haven't bought any music since about 1940-something, it's obvious that they'll ask for the same old stuff: hymns, more hymns, and yet more hymns. All slowed down to a snails pace of course, so their ear trumpets don't explode with all the excitement! Their opinions didn't exactly help CD#3 (it's this same crowd who insisted everything was slowed to a dirge), so why they should have input on CD#4 is beyond me.

Is it because Susan and her team actually believe there are really diverse fans there? - well there would be if the site had 5,000 (or is that 50,000?) truly active members instead of about 2-300 and falling. I shall despair if the next CD again has Susan singing according to Macs arrangements instead of singing songs that suit her glorious voice!

IF Andy Stephens or Nicole go to SBFII and read, they know without a shadow of doubt, that, in general, the membership is made up mostly of senior adults.

---

I will update my stats within a few days...

fudgemeister wrote:

Emmylou wrote:

Admin wrote:

Yes, it would appear that the same old ultra-conservative wealthy religious 'ladies who lunch' have again been approached for their opinions on what CD#4 should contain. Given that these people haven't bought any music since about 1940-something, it's obvious that they'll ask for the same old stuff: hymns, more hymns, and yet more hymns. All slowed down to a snails pace of course, so their ear trumpets don't explode with all the excitement! Their opinions didn't exactly help CD#3 (it's this same crowd who insisted everything was slowed to a dirge), so why they should have input on CD#4 is beyond me.

Is it because Susan and her team actually believe there are really diverse fans there? - well there would be if the site had 5,000 (or is that 50,000?) truly active members instead of about 2-300 and falling. I shall despair if the next CD again has Susan singing according to Macs arrangements instead of singing songs that suit her glorious voice!

IF Andy Stephens or Nicole go to SBFII and read, they know without a shadow of doubt, that, in general, the membership is made up mostly of senior adults.

Well, technically they're adults I suppose, though they act like spoilt 3 year olds most of the time.

A poll such as this should have been carried out on her official site so as to include the views of as diverse a group as possible. Asking the same old 200 or so old women seems pointless to me. Despite what they think, they were not responsible for her selling so many CDs, unless they all bought tens of thousands of copies each, so the sensible thing to do would be to ask for the views of those who did buy all those CDs - the general public.

---

Next week the ew group-pre-mod-throw-out has been a year ago... that's definitely not the way to manage a forum, unless - for some reason - you prefer to stimulate group-thinking and behaviour...


Thanks to DJG who created on time this funny - and at the same time d*mned serious - place for freethinkers...